CO129-068 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12] — Page 550

54

The second instance is like unto the first,

55

546

,

!

but not of

of exactly the

same character. Here

the alteration must have been made in the

Manuscript for this Thorf

and the Revise

are equally deficient.

the Inquiry, after using the

Mr. Dixson, on the second day of

the words "The

fire referred to (where the threatening gesture was made) was at the Police Station; not

at Taipingshan, (which

one in print) made

remarkable Statement; -

the following very

Meah chow. why

in his hand when he

1

wny had a drawn sund

madu

the gesture towards me

He was at the head of a bray of Chinamen

and he was shewing them whow to definit Mr.

batdwells furniture.!

This

Abinutes of Crident

of the 28th May 1888. p.8.

This Statement is not in prent.

I presume that it is in the manuscript of

the Minutes: fr

for

I Law. Mr. Dick write-

down something, apson muy asking the

chan

maw

Cas

R

&pectator mouly.)

whether

it was not of sufficient importance to be

recorded, and

upon receiving the

Chairman's assent to

my Suggestion.

Mr. Inglis's evidence, given

Minules of the 30 June 1858

when I

was not

1.28.

Containe w

present, co

In a

J

day

am told,

Much important matter relating to his own

personal experience, and bearing directly on

is

absurdly called "the

is to say

of

the personal

what

class of charges, that

first-

family

Connections

ana

Mr. & Mrs Caldwell with brothels: which

matter has keen to reduced in the minutis as

b

be

nearly

valualess. I derive

my information not

only

$547

547